68
/100
TT-2026-00031HIGH

James Chen

Forged bank statement with balance manipulation

Loan Amount
$750,000
Documents
2
Flags
5
Broker
Premier Lending Solutions
Recommended: Manual Review

Flags detected that require human assessment before a decision can be made.

Analysis Summary

Bank statement closing balance does not reconcile with transactions. Opening balance plus credits minus debits results in $42,318.50, but the statement shows a closing balance of $58,318.50 — a $16,000 discrepancy suggesting the closing balance was manually inflated. The salary credit amount also doesn't match the payslip net income. Additionally, both documents were submitted by Premier Lending Solutions, a broker already flagged for elevated fraud rates.

Select a document above to view the original PDF and see which fraud flags were detected in it

Fraud Flags (5)

Consistency Check(2)
CRITICALClosing balance does not reconcileBALANCE_MISMATCH

Opening: $34,567.20 + Credits: $18,451.30 − Debits: $10,700.00 = Expected closing: $42,318.50. Statement shows closing: $58,318.50. Discrepancy: +$16,000.00. The closing balance appears to have been manually increased.

Evidence
opening: 34567.2
credits: 18451.3
debits: 10700
expected closing: 42318.5
shown closing: 58318.5
discrepancy: 16000
HIGHSalary credit doesn't match payslip net incomeINCOME_MISMATCH

Payslip shows net pay of $7,842.33 but bank statement shows salary credit of $8,450.00 from the same employer on the expected pay date. Discrepancy of $607.67.

Evidence
payslip net: 7842.33
bank credit: 8450
discrepancy: 607.67
Broker Risk(1)
HIGHBroker has elevated fraud rateBROKER_HIGH_FRAUD_RATE

Premier Lending Solutions has submitted 23 cases, of which 7 (30.4%) have generated fraud flags. This exceeds the 20% threshold for broker risk flagging. This is the same broker flagged in case TT-2026-00017.

Evidence
broker name: Premier Lending Solutions
total cases: 23
flagged cases: 7
fraud rate: 30.4
PDF Forensics(1)
MEDIUMInconsistent image resolution across pagesMIXED_DPI

Pages 1-2 are 150 DPI but page 3 (containing the closing balance summary) is 300 DPI. Different scan resolutions suggest page 3 was separately produced and combined.

Evidence
page 1 dpi: 150
page 2 dpi: 150
page 3 dpi: 300
AI Content Detection(1)
MEDIUMTransaction descriptions appear templatedTRANSACTION_PATTERN_SUSPICIOUS

Multiple transaction descriptions follow identical formatting patterns ("DIRECT CREDIT [EMPLOYER] [AMOUNT]") which differs from genuine Westpac statement formatting. Genuine Westpac statements use "SALARY [BSB-ACCT] [EMPLOYER]".

Evidence
pattern found: DIRECT CREDIT [NAME] [AMT]
expected pattern: SALARY [BSB-ACCT] [NAME]